Latest news:

Pearl Harbor Event (12/7)

Wreath Laying (12/14)

VA COLA Increase

Chapter 115 earns award

Meeting Minutes (11/3/12)

Find us on Facebook

TREA Legislative Update for January 12, 2007

The 110th Congress has started with drama and more. The new Democratic Majority started in the house looking at Medicare drug bills and proposed increases in the federal minimum wage. Then it turned to President Bush’s new plans for the Iraq War.

1) President Proposed Major Shift In Iraq War Tactics

2) New Secretary Of Defense Makes Policy Announcements

3) VA’s Cost-of-Living (COLA) Increases Go Into Effect

4) New Organizational Changes on Veteran and Retirees Matters on the Hill

5) New Websites for Traumatic Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance (TSGLI) and Combat Related Compensation (CRSC)


Military Reunions


1) President Proposed Major Shift In Iraq War Tactics-On Wednesday night called for a surge of 21,500 additional American Soldiers and Marines to try to bring an end to the sectarian violence in Baghdad and stabilize Iraq. The President did not place a dollar figure on this new push but he did propose more than $1 billion additional dollars for Iraq reconstruction and jobs. Next month the President is expected will be requesting at least $100 billion in supplemental war spending Some Congressional Democratic leaders indicated that they may try to stop funding for the proposed troop increase.

2) New Secretary of Defense Makes Policy Announcements-On Thursday afternoon new SecDef Robert M. Gates made announcements concerning military end strength and changes in policy for activating the Guard and Reserve. He told the House Armed Services Committee that he had recommended a permanent increase for the Army and Marines of 92,000 soldiers and Marines (65,000 soldiers and 27,000 Marines). He also announced several changes in how DOD manage and deploy members of the Guard and Reserves. These included mobilizing ground reserve forces on a unit rather than individual basis and having involuntary mobilizations be for a maximum of a year rather than the present sixteen to twenty four months. (A Copy of the SECDEF’s full statement is at the end of the Update)

3) VA’s Cost-of-Living (COLA) Increases Go Into Effect-Starting in January VA disability and survivors payments will increase by 3.3% The COLA applies to the VA’s programs covering: Veterans disability payments, Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC) payments, Pension disability payments and payments for survivors of wartime veterans who died in service or as a result of service connected disabilities. For more information go to the VA’s website at or call 1-800-827-1000.

4) New Organizational Changes on Veteran and Retirees Matters on the Hill-There are new organizational activities going on at the House and Senate VA Committees and the House Armed Services Committee (HASC) and Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC). Speaker Pelosi (D-CA) announced the resumption of the yearly practice of holding Joint House and Senate VA Committee Hearings for Veterans Groups. This longstanding practice was ended in 2005 by the then House VA Chairman Steve Buyer (R Ind). At the HASC Chairman Ike Skelton (D-MO) announced the new Subcommittee Chairmen: Representative Solomon Ortiz (D-TX) -Readiness Subcommittee; Representative Gene Taylor (D-MS) -Seapower and Expeditionary Forces Subcommittee; Representative Neil Abercrombie (D-HI) -Air and Land Forces Subcommittee; Representative Martin Meehan (D-MA) --Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee; Representative Vic Snyder (D-AR) -Military Personnel Subcommittee; Representative Adam Smith (D-WA) -Terrorism, Unconventional Threats and Capabilities Subcommittee;  Representative Ellen Tauscher (D-CA) -Strategic Forces Subcommittee

5) New Websites for Traumatic Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance ( TSGLI) and Combat Related Compensation (CRSC)-The Army has put up newly redesigned and improved websites to deal with TSGLI and CRSC. They should be much easier to use They are:. and


THURSDAY, JANUARY 11, 2007 – 1:00 P.M.

Mr. Chairman, Congressman Hunter, members of the Committee.

Let me say at the outset that it is a pleasure to appear before this Committee for the first time as Secretary of Defense. The House Armed Services Committee has long been a steadfast friend and ally of our men and women in uniform and a source of support in meeting our nation’s defense needs. Thank you for that. I look forward to working with you.

Let me begin by advising you of two announcements I made this morning.

First, the President announced last night that he would strengthen our military for the long war against terrorism by authorizing an increase in the overall strength of the Army and the Marine Corps. I am recommending to him a total increase in the two services of 92,000 soldiers and Marines over the next five years – 65,000 soldiers and 27,000 Marines. The emphasis will be on increasing combat capability.

This increase will be accomplished in two ways. First, we will propose to make permanent the temporary increase of 30,000 for the Army and 5,000 for the Marine Corps. Then we propose to build up from that base in annual increments of 7,000 troops for the Army, and 5,000 for the Marine Corps until they reach a level of 202,000.

I am aware that the Armed Services committees have been leading the national debate over the proper size of the military. Accordingly, I hope that you will join in supporting this important initiative.

While it may take some time for these new troops to become available for deployment, it is important that our men and women in uniform know that additional manpower and resources are on the way.

Second, for several months, the Department has been assessing whether we have the right policies to govern how we manage and deploy members of the Reserves, the National Guard and our active component units.

Based on this assessment and the recommendations of our military leadership, I am prepared to make the following changes to Department policy.

First, mobilization of ground reserve forces will be managed on a unit basis instead of an individual basis. This change will allow us to achieve greater unit cohesion and predictability in how reserve units train and deploy

Second, from this point forward, members of the Reserves will be involuntarily mobilized for a maximum of one year at any one time, in contrast to the current practice of sixteen to twenty-four months.

Third, the planning objective for guard and reserve units will remain one year of being mobilized followed by five years demobilized. However, today’s global demands will require a number of selected guard and reserve units to be remobilized sooner than this standard. Our intention is that such exceptions be temporary. The goal for the active force rotation cycle remains one year deployed for every two years at home station. Today, most active units are receiving one year at home station before deploying again. Mobilizing select guard and reserve units before this five year period is complete will allow us to move closer to relieving the stress on the total force.

Fourth, I am directing the establishment of a new program to compensate individuals in both the active and reserve components that are required to mobilize or deploy early or extend beyond the established rotation policy goals.

Fifth, I am also directing that all commands and units review how they administer the hardship waiver program to ensure they are properly taking into account exceptional circumstances facing military families of deployed service members.

It is important to note that these policy changes have been under discussion for some time within the Department of Defense and would have needed to take place irrespective of the President’s announcement on Iraq.

I am also pleased to report that all active branches of the U.S. military exceeded their recruiting goals for the month of December, with particularly strong showings by the Army and Marine Corps. Our nation is truly blessed that so many talented and patriotic young people have stepped forward to defend our nation, and that so many servicemen and women have chosen to continue to serve. Copies of the text of these announcements are available.

Iraq Strategy

Last night, the President described a new way forward in Iraq – a new approach to overcoming the steep challenges facing us in that country and in that part of the world.

I know many of you have concerns about the new strategy in Iraq and, in particular, are skeptical of the Iraqi government’s will and ability to act decisively against sectarian violence, and are skeptical as well about a commitment of additional American troops. The President and his national security team have had the same concerns, as we have debated and examined our options in Iraq going forward. And yet, our commanders on the ground – and the President’s intended nominee as the new commander – believe this is a sound plan, in no small part because General Casey and other senior military officers have worked closely with the Iraqi government in developing it. Further, the President, Ambassador Khalilizad, and General Casey have had prolonged and extremely candid conversations not just with Prime Minister Maliki but with other senior leaders of the Iraqi government and have come away persuaded they have the will to act against all instigators of violence in Baghdad.

This is, I think, the pivot point in Iraq as the Iraqi government insists on assuming the mantle of leadership in the effort to regain control of its own capital. While I doubt General Pace and I can change many minds here today, perhaps we can allay at least some of your concerns. Above all, I want you to know that the timetable for the introduction of additional U.S. forces will provide ample opportunity early on – and before many of the additional U.S. troops arrive in Iraq – to evaluate the progress of this endeavor and whether the Iraqis are fulfilling their commitments to us.

Before General Pace summarizes the military elements of the President’s plan, let me make two additional points. First, this strategy entails a strengthening across all aspects of the war effort – military and non-military – including the economic, governance and political areas. Overcoming the challenges in Iraq cannot be achieved simply by military means – no matter how large or sustained – without progress by the Iraqis in addressing the underlying issues dividing that country.

Second, we must keep in mind the consequences of an American failure in Iraq. Multiple administrations of both political parties have concluded that what happens in southwest Asia, the Gulf region, and the Middle East more broadly is of vital interest to the security and prosperity of the American people. As I said in my confirmation hearing, developments in Iraq over the next year or two will shape the future of the Middle East and impact global geopolitics for a long time to come.

Whatever one’s views of the original decision to go to war and the decisions that brought us to this point, there is broad agreement that failure in Iraq would be a calamity for our nation of lasting historical consequence.

The violence in Iraq, if unchecked, could spread outside its borders and draw other states into a regional conflagration. In addition, one would see:

The actors in this region – both friends and adversaries – are watching closely what we do in Iraq and will draw conclusions about our resolve and the reliability of our commitments. And should we withdraw prematurely, we could well leave chaos and the disintegration of Iraq behind us. Further, governments in the region probably are already asking themselves: If the Americans withdraw in defeat from Iraq, just how much farther, and from where else, might we withdraw?

I would not have taken this position if I did not believe that the outcome in Iraq will have a profound and long-lived impact on our national interest.

Significant mistakes have been made by the U.S. in Iraq, just like in virtually every war in human history. That is the nature of war. But, however we got to this moment, the stakes now are incalculable.

Your senior professional military officers in Iraq and in Washington believe in the efficacy of the strategy outlined by the President last night. They believe it is a sound plan that can work if the Iraqi government follows through on its commitments and if the non-military aspects of the strategy are implemented and sustained.

Our senior military officers have worked closely with the Iraqis to develop this plan. The impetus to add U.S. forces came initially from our commanders there. It would be a sublime, yet historic, irony if those who believe the views of the military professionals were neglected at the onset of the war were now to dismiss the views of the military as irrelevant or wrong.


Military Reunions

Did you know that TREA has a large listing of military reunions on their website???  Go to: and check it out.  Is your ship or unit having a reunion?  There is a place that you can submit the information to us.  Be sure and share this with all your buddies.